Hollow Moon?
or
From Where The Bells Toll by Dennis Crenshaw
Another piece of evidence pointing towards the
theory that all heavenly bodies are hollow is that, as you would expect with a hollow
sphere, both the Earth and our moon are known to "ring like a bell" when hit
with a shock wave.
In "Moongate: Suppressed findings of The US Space Program" (1982), Nuclear
Engineer and researcher/writer William L. Brian II presents evidence proving that the
moon, as any hollow sphere would, "rings" when hit by asteroids or heavy space
junk. And that's not all. According to Dr. Brian, "the evidence provided by Apollo
seismic experiments also points to the conclusion that the moon is hollow and relatively
rigid." (1)
He also reports:
"It is not commonly known that the Earth displays the same bell-like ringing or
reverberations as the moon. Since the Earth is 81.56 times more massive than the moon, it
takes a much larger explosion or shock wave to generate this effect.
"Joseph Goodavage referenced such occurrences in his book, "Astrology: The Space
Age Science". He mentioned that the ringing effect was recorded during the May 22,
1960 Chilean earthquake. This was supposedly the most violent earthquake that had been
recorded since the establishment of official world records in 1881. Goodavage provided a
description of the effect which was given at the 1961 World Earthquake Conference, held at
Helsinki, Finland.
The description stated that the shock was so severe that the "entire planet rang like
a bell". The ringing continued for a considerable length of time in a regular series
of slow impulses which were recorded at various independent seismic stations. Goodavage
also noted that the planet rang again as a result of the Anchorage, Alaska earthquake of
March 27, 1964. It seems hard to believe that scientists were so appalled in finding that
the moon rang like a bell. After all, the Earth displays the same characteristic".
(2)
Proof that the "ringing" of the moon is common knowledge in the scientific and
NASA communities is presented in communications between Mission Control and the men aboard
the Apollo 17 moon mission on December 29, 1972.
"LUNAR MODULE PILOT (LMP): Was there any indication on the seismometers on the impact
about the time I saw a light flash on the surface? CAPCOM: Stand by. We'll check on that.
LMP: A UFO perhaps, don't worry about it. It could have been one of the other flashes of
light
CAPCOM: Jack, just some words from the back room for you. There may have been an impact at
the time you called, but . So it would mask any other impact." (3)
Research/Writer Don Wilson presents other well-documented evidence supporting the Hollow
Moon Theory.
"The moon has only 60% of the density of Earth. The improbable fact that an equal
amount of earth material seemed to weigh almost twice as much as moon matter mystified
everyone. Why the difference? The actual answer, some scientists felt, pointed to the
possibility that part or all of the moon's interior was hollow!" (4)
Then there's a report in the July 1962 issue of Astronautics by Dr. Gordon McDonald, a
leading scientist at the Nation Aeronautics and Space Administration in which he states
that "according to an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is
hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the
interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the
moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.’" (5)
In 1959 eminent scientist Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his findings in relation to
the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully weighing up the evidence he
concludes that they are both hollow" (6)
While some "orthodox" scientists will quietly admit that some earthly bodies are
probably hollow, they steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that ALL planets and moons are
NATURALLY hollow and hurry to add they must be "artificial" satellites.
For instance:
"The moon seems to be a comparatively light world in contrast with the planet Earth.
The fact that the moon is only about 60% as dense as our planet has led scientists to two
theories: that the moon is without an iron core, and/or, that it is partially hollow.
"Data and computations – among them, Dr. McDonald's motion studies, – point
to the conclusion that our moon is internally hollow to a great extent.
Since most scientists claim there is no natural explanation for such peculiar phenomenon
(because satellite worlds are not naturally hollow), the inevitable conclusion indicates
that the moon is artificially hollow." (7)
Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the
facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the
system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support the theory laid out by
Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are hollow.
(1) "Moongate: Suppressed findings of the US Space Program". William L. Brian
II. Portland, OR: Future Research Publishing Co. 1982. (page 126). (2) Ibid. (page
126-127).
(3) "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon. Donald K. Wilson. New York, NY: Dell Publishing
Co. 1975. (page 60).
(4) Ibid. (page 71).
(5) Ibid. (page 73).
(6) Ibid. (page 82).
(7) Ibid. (page 89). |
